It teaches me about the diversity in experiences of people. If it was not for these books my estimation of the variation in life experiences among people, would have been consistently very low.
The worst impact that I have faced is that of frequently running into conflicts in discussion with others. When I rationalize decisions and actions with them.
A common symptom that I have observed when I rationalize is my ignorance of detail. This ignorance leads to generalization. I assume given my experience a given decision is not right and I generalize it across a group of people by attribution. Because I am not aware of the experience of this person I am rationalizing with, I have to do an attribution to a point item. The other option is to try to find logical fallacies or ignorance in their argument, afterwards close the discussion. The latter approach means in new encounters I have to do new thinking and search for information every time an individual makes a decision that I do not agree with. It is not good for my lazy mind.
Thus I generalize. When I do that I have underestimated the diversity of experiences within this generalized group of people, ironically a group in which I do not know a single individual well
Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by ronystaaar from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows. Please find us at the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.
If you would like to delegate to the Minnow Support Project you can do so by clicking on the following links: 50SP, 100SP, 250SP, 500SP, 1000SP, 5000SP.
Be sure to leave at least 50SP undelegated on your account.