Well, @guiltyparties I just wanted to figure out who the link was. Thank you for the clarification. Then you have more responsibility in all this because @Steemcleaners is a serious matter and so it risks only losing credibility in front of the whole community.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
No, it's not the type of link you're thinking. "Liaison" means that I advise projects on how @steemcleaners work and what falls or doesn't fall within our scope and answer any questions that are not confidential. It's exactly the same as you coming to talk to me as a person (which you should do if you'd like). The reason for one "liaison" is because the rest of the team are usually busy.
Lol, steemcleaners has been questionable since the very beginning for selectively enforcing the rules.
Nothing new, but they were all we had.
Now we got others, and an impossible task.
They all do what they can.
Without them the abuse would be more pervasive.
@feebornangel Applying the rules selectively means being corrupt. And this is.
I don't doubt it, steemcleaners has had that problem from the very beginning.
I was here.
It doesn't change hiring a bully to take rewards into something I would support.
You can see from my unpopularity that I say things people don't like to hear.
Most are scared to speak truth to power.
It doesn't cause me to go out and pay for some rewards.
Which is why I flagged your post, but upvoted your comment.
The way I see it, there was a hijackening of the chain to facilitate abuse by the few.
When you pay for rewards, you pay for abuse that benefits only you, and the particular bully.
I don't think that 'bid bots are bad' is really contentious as a concept, at this point.
For me the story is closed. Steemcleaners can leave his robots attached to me as much as he wants. So everyone sees their abuse towards me. Thanks for your attention @freebornangel but I don't intend to talk about it anymore.