English Version On Todays Article:
In the past few days, there was a news message that caught my attention.
Wal-Mart Supermarkets announced that it will stop supporting Alipay from now on. Instead, mobile phone payment will only support WeChat payment, and it will be announced as follows.
(Picture)
For this, I suddenly remembered a few years ago the domestic 3Q World War (360 and Tencent QQ contest), one day, Tencent QQ made an announcement, the effect is that he made a hard decision, from now on Will stop running QQ software on the computer with 360 software, advocates must uninstall 360 software before landing QQ, and so on.
On the surface, it seems that these companies are "forced to do so" for the sake of users, but it is not. As a company, users of the products launched have the right to choose. Users can like 360 and can also enjoy Tencent QQ. However, as a company, you can't rape public opinion, can't force users to like your products, and even use some means. This is obviously It is ridiculous and unacceptable. What is even more ridiculous is that, under this posership, he also disguised himself as the weak person of a victim in an attempt to win public sympathy. Unexpectedly, the eyes of the public are bright. , do not buy it at all or even spontaneously boycott, and later Tencent forced the pressure to finally recover. . .
Time and again, the same kind of thing happened to Wal-Mart. In fact, honestly speaking, domestic supermarkets have developed rapidly in the past few years. Under the competition of many dazzling supermarkets, including unpopulated supermarkets that are now emerging, people in the country may not even be able to Remembering Wal-Mart, until I saw this message, I remembered how much Wal-Mart was in the country many years ago. However, now that I rely on a three-line information that cannot be reached by eight poles, I have regained the attention of people.
Not to mention the competition or interest behind Wal-Mart's business, we look at Tencent's response this time: respecting the choices of users. Since the bad move of Tencent in the last 3Q wars, I have always believed that the response of Tencent's public relations departments is really unsatisfactory. The crisis is actually a bad move. This time, in response to the public’s response, I think it’s not as good as Do not speak, talk about the feeling may make people more kind of "no silver three hundred and two here" does not play tricks.
Coincidentally, I received a message from today’s headline in the mailbox. In general, such companies often send advertisements and other spam to me, but this time there was an email that was beyond my expectation. Picture: (picture) The general idea is that today's headline is in dispute with a company. It is normal to have disputes. You can find the other person to negotiate and the negotiation does not result in an appeal to the court. However, this headline was not correct. I had to send an e-mail to inform all his users. Even if the user had the same number of users, and he or she did not agree with them, he rightly rebuked the other company in the e-mail. I would not understand it. This is for users, is to let users help you solve the problem? This user does not have this ability? Still like gang fights, in order to give their own courage, first pull Zhang Hu Pila a banner, pretending to be, Dora a few heads made the momentum, trying to get from the momentum to each other?
This is the 21st century. Can you not come to this set? The next time you are in a conflict, can you stop using your users as a shield?
This article written by: rivalhw
Thanks my friend for written those type of good content and share such a great photos with us.
Sir @rivalhw Thank you so much for supporting me. I show respect to you. I hope you will present such a good post in front of us in the future. I hope sir will write something better in the future that we will be very proud of you.