You make some interesting points. However the inherent inequality itself will kill the platform more than people complaining about it will. I think this the same thing that we see as a justification for inequalities in real life i.e. if you aren't rich then it is your fault. Clearly things are more complicated than that in regular life and that is the situation here too.
The situation regarding which posts are successful or not needs to have some consistency which right now it doesn't - in some ways it seems to be very random. Some people are rewarded for stealing other people's material - this should not be rewarded at all.
There also seems to be a strong bias towards posts that are strongly positive rather than offering any constructive criticism of the platform. I don't see why that is good. An echo-chamber mentality is not and never has been successful in the long term. It merely encourages group-think and the perpetuation of flawed thinking. The DAO (which I discuss in my last post) is a perfect example of what that gets you.
I understand that this is early days and this is not a mature platform but if the creators are going to go round talking about inequality and trying to help reduce it then they need to show it with their actions and not just their words.