Thanks for your comment. The issue with limiting guns (or anything) only to those who fit a certain description - is that this means that one group or individual must judge the others, which opens the door to abuse, error and imbalance. We have a situation where 'the winners' wrote the history books and so the mainstream understanding of who we are and what is 'right' is seriously twisted. As a result, it could be easy for a truly evil group to convince the majority to go along with taking guns away from people who fit a certain profile - without that majority realising that the profile was basically 'the political opponents of the people taking the guns'.
This is exactly the reason why the constitution of the USA makes allowance for an armed population.
I do appreciate that there are some people who are a real threat if they have a gun, but it is not until they overpower the free will of others that action should be taken to correct the balance.
To be calm and peaceful absolutely requires us to accept all of our most denied and judged against feelings, such as the extreme rage that most people think they don't have, but do - in a state of denial. It is only through this heartfelt approach of self acceptance and evolution that real peace and calm can be the lived experience.
Ultimately, we do not need guns - but with a hugely imbalance society such as we experience today, it is going to take a major journey of learning before many people will put them down. We are undergoing that journey, but part of that healing journey is to stop trying to control other people.