I have myself counseled against a depopulation agenda, but I am, I believe quite rightly, exercised at being considered a suitable guinea pig for DOD bioweapons tests, which the jabs appear to have been, and still be, by all evidence.
While your prior statement was that you had seen no evidence, and now presented with it you say you had seen it already and now dismiss it as a temporary effect of stress, I am rather nonplussed by your casual approach to evidence. Something you neglect in your dismissal is that birth rates have plummeted. Rather than a restoration of prior fertility rates, far fewer pregnancies are occurring.
Neither have jabs been increasing. After 2022 they plummeted as the pathogenicity of SARS2 variants dramatically decreased, and the reports of toxicity of the jabs equally dramatically increased. Uptake of the jabs dropped off to single digits, and the majority of jab recipients never got a booster at all.
Regardless of whether there is or isn't a depopulation agenda, the sovereignty of human people is grievously disregarded by the MIC, the WEF, and every government on Earth, with no government I am aware of not having agents that are not guilty of capital crimes against humanity that either will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of just laws, or will leave my sons and their peers facing a desperate struggle to maintain their human rights as a global conquest by a technocratic totalitarian tyranny proceeds.
I am glad I taught them to shoot straight and respect themselves.
I would appreciate greater attention to matters of fact in your discussions henceforth, as the variance was overly wide between your prior claim you had seen no evidence of 4x increase in misscarriages you now tell me wasn't true and that you had seen it, but dismissed it as unlikely to be related to the toxicity of the jabs. Even though I went to some lengths to point out the toxicity of the LNP's and their known propensity to collect in the ovaries, as well as SV40 and excessive contamination with artificial and fragmentary DNA, you do not address it and rely on what appears to be speculation about stress without any evidentiary basis. I do seek rigor in discerning facts, and dismiss hunches and gut feelings as transitory and generally without merit.