lmao. I think this hole debate is so dumb and nonsensical. They say it's not living life because it requires the mother womb.. Would they say the same about brain eating parasites? Are they none living life forms for they need to be in your skull to live? If only the these people referred to fetuses as parasites at least then there would be some honesty.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
No one is saying its not life. That is a straw man argument.
However, an individual has no right to draw resources from another individual. For example, even if I were dying of kidney failure, I have no right to attach myself to your body and use your kidney's to filter my blood. I can't force you to keep me alive. That would be against your bodily autonomy,
So, despite being alive and having rights, I still don't have a right to use your body.
The same logic can apply to a fetus.
I guess the only real answer to this problem is for science to create a way to transfer a fetus from the mothers womb to an artificial womb that can sustain its life. I'm pretty sure this would satisfy all sides.
Yes, I think it would.
Although, by the time we have the type of technology, would any woman actually carry their own baby at all? Why burden yourself for 9 months if you could use an artificial womb?
Then what happens to humanity? I believe women gain just as much from being pregnant as the child does...just in different ways.