ADSactly Culture: The Sidekick Archetype
This is often the most overlooked character of the story. After all, it's not the hero himself we're talking about, they're not protagonists and surely, if the loyal side-kick hadn't been there to do so-and-so thing, then someone else would've stepped up to the job. It wasn't vital. It's not like only Sam can accompany Frodo on his journey to Mordor...is it?
Is it?
Often enough, the sidekick is also used to provide some comic relief, playing the funny, sometimes goofy character and that doesn't really help in taking them seriously. And besides, the sidekick's main purpose, as far as the story is concerned, is to be with the main character. That is pretty much it.
It's quite interesting to see how these archetypes are defined by the protagonist of the story – the mentor has to guide someone and the sidekick has to be at someone's side. They are heroes, but only as long as there is a main character to exist around.
There is a fine line between mentor and sidekick, though. It used to be clear that the mentor teaches the hero and the hero teaches the sidekick, never the other way around. But nowadays, the lines have perhaps become a bit blurred. Sidekicks can sometimes take on the role of mentor as well. But unlike mentors, sidekicks have to stay the full story. Whereas mentors can and often need to disappear at some point (in order for the hero to stand on his own legs), the sidekick's whole point is to take the whole journey alongside the hero.
The sidekick can be a secondary character, staying within the boundaries of helper and just that, but he can also be developed into a larger character, eventually even becoming co-protagonist. For example, Ron Weasley in the Harry Potter series is a sidekick, but not just. He does have his own personal story and while he is there to help Harry on his journey, he has his own journey to take. That's an example of a developed sidekick.
But let us look at some sidekick examples, shall we? I promise there are interesting things ahead.
1. Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger (Harry Potter)
Since I just mentioned Ron, it seemed only natural to start with these two. Ron and Hermione are two interesting examples because they take on other roles as well. Besides being a sidekick, Hermione takes on the role of mentor, sometimes, because of her vast magical knowledge. She sometimes serves as teacher to Harry, but remains a sidekick (accompanying Harry to the very end of the story).
Also, Ron Weasley often provides comedic moments, lightening the mood, and turning into the joker character ever so often. He also is on a journey of proving his self-worth and often provides the muscle factor to the story.
They both have their own personal story-arcs and while important to the story, neither actually takes over the main plot. They are supported within the main story-arc, but neither is quite as profound as Harry Potter's own journey.
So they remain in the shoes of sidekicks.
2. John Watson (Sherlock Holmes)
This one is another classic. It's usually the role of the sidekick that besides loyal companion, they also provide a contrast to the protagonist. John Watson rises up to that role. He is the scientific side as opposed to his friend's deductive side. He is the gentleman, the more traditionally Victorian character, as opposed to Sherlock's eccentric, more analytic character. And finally, he is the more humane type, often contrasting Sherlock's apparent lack of emotions.
This is a very important part of the sidekick's role – through contrast, they must bring out important traits in the protagonist. Like the mentor, they must challenge the main character while also supporting him. Because the sidekick, in this case Watson, is also very much alike the main character. Despite a few key opposing points, the protagonist and the sidekick are two sides of the same coin, they must have a common core in order for the story to work. The sidekick's job is to keep in check the worse part of the main character while also bringing out the good.
Dr Watson constantly does this for Sherlock Holmes, always being the wall off of which Sherlock can bounce back. And not only.
Holmes was a man of habits... and I had become one of them... a comrade... upon whose nerve he could place some reliance... a whetstone for his mind. I stimulated him... If I irritated him by a certain methodical slowness in my mentality, that irritation served only to make his own flame-like intuitions and impressions flash up the more vividly and swiftly. Such was my humble role in our alliance.
-Dr Watson in "The Adventure of the Creeping Man"
3. Samwise Gamgee (Lord of the Rings Trilogy)
I've left Sam for last although he's the first sidekick example that comes to mind. The truth is Sam is a very tricky character and I first needed to establish the traditional part of the sidekick before taking on the character of Sam. Why?
Because Sam transcends the job of “just a sidekick”. Interestingly, JRR Tolkien actually went on to say that Samwise was the real hero of the story and not Frodo Baggins, as you are led to believe. And this is a very strange thing to say, because by all accounts, Frodo seems to be the main character – a lot of the story is told from his perspective and he is, after all, the Ringbearer. All other journeys, at least throughout the trilogy, relate to his journey to destroy the Ring.
So why did Tolkien say this?
Well, if you think about it, Sam is the character who undertakes the greatest transformation. He goes from a simple farmer who dreams of adventures, of elves and magic, to actually being one of the main characters in such an epic journey. It's an adventure that is to be expected for Frodo, being after all a Baggins, but not for Sam. Also, it's interesting to note that the story doesn't end with Frodo leaving Middle-Earth with the elves, but rather with Sam coming home to his Rosie.
'I'm back.' he says. Now, why would the story end like that if Sam was nothing but a sidekick? Why not with Frodo going with the elves? It seems more epic, surely.
And Sam saves the world, let's not forget. The actual destruction of the Ring only comes about through Sam's determination. Frodo nearly throws it all away. Sam has many interesting, often overlooked sides to him. He carries Frodo up the mountain, no easy task. He is the only Ringbearer to be undamaged by its power (he carries the ring when Frodo is wounded in Shelob's Lair) and let's not forget, he kills a huge, terrifying spider in one-on-one combat.
And while Frodo is damaged beyond repair by his journey, losing something essential of himself, Sam is not. He has a far more optimistic view and throughout, he is fueled by love (for Frodo, the Shire, Rosie, his life up to now) whereas Frodo is fueled by a sense of duty.
And so, while Samwise seems the typical sidekick character, I don't think he is. A hidden hero, perhaps? A sidekick-turned-hero? I don't know, but I guess he just goes to show things aren't always as they seem.
In any story.
So, who is your favorite sidekick? Let us know in the comments!
References:
Dr Watson - Wikipedia
Character Archetypes - S for Sidekick
All About Sam – Why the Main Character of ‘The Lord of the Rings’ is Really Samwise Gamgee
Did Tolkien really explicitly consider Sam the true hero of The Lord of the Rings?
Authored by: @honeydue
Click on the coin to join our Discord Chat
Witness proposal is here:
Go To Steem Witness Page
In the bottom of the page type: adsactly-witness and press vote.
Use small letters and no "@" sign. Or, click here to vote directly!
Thank you!
In the popular Chinese classic Romance of the Three Kingdoms, one of the main characters, Liu Bei, actually has 2 sidekicks, his sworn brothers Guan Yu and Zhang Fei. They were introduced quite early in the story and, from then on, were always together. So there could be more than one sidekick for the main character. In the same vein, you could say that Harry Potter's 2 sidekicks are Hermione and Ron Weasley. However, I think 2 sidekicks is the maximum possible. Any number more than 2 is bound to run into problems of multiple interactions between the characters and dilutes the impact of the main character. When you have more than 3 characters, you have an adventuring party!
Interestings topic. I think that heroes and sidekicks have some layers of power and politics to it. Sometimes it is gender, sometimes it is race, but in both movies and literature there are quite a few examples of secondary characters who are more talented or do more than the main character or hero.
Hermione, as you mention is probably the most remarkable case in modern pop ulture.
I like Gromit, from Wallace and Gromit the british animated cartoon. The smart dog does all the job, the stupid Wallace takes all the credit.
Like antiheroes, these characters can sometimes steal cameras from the protagonist. They become favorite, central characters, not only because of their character but also because of the unconditional friendship they profess. Although in many cases they can live in the shadows, some shine with their own light. I remember many couples that I don't see without each other, such as Lion King Timon and Pumba; Pinky and Brain; Joey and Chandler of Friends; Howard and Raj The Big Bang Theory. The list is long and endless. Thank you for such a beautiful post, @honeydue. Maybe you can make one, about friendship day, with the most inseparable friends. Greetings.
Inspiring Post
In the journey of our lives both in fiction and reality, it turns out we need and there is always someone who is a companion. As with the story raised with the main character there will certainly be figures who assist in completing the mission. It could be initially not the ideal partner. But the time travel and the stronger ties make them a couple who are able to solve the problem. Even this sidekick is not to seize the position of the main character. just look at how Sam was fully aware that only Frodo could solve the ring problem to Mordor. he was solely responsible for helping him to finish. In the course of course there was a desire to take on the role of Frodo, but it was quickly awakened so that he was fully aware that Sam was only in charge of helping Frodo.
Thus in the batman and Robin couples, or other hero pairs all can put themselves in their respective positions.
Thank you @honeydue
Thank you @adsactly
Thank you Steemit
Warm regard from Indonesia
Following your line of works, pleasant and of great interest, @honeydue. I believe that the companion par excellence of universal literature is Sancho Panza, who comes to occupy a place as important as Don Quixote in the history of the novel. There is a previous one that is confused with a guide, but that accompanies the main character during almost all his journey and his revelations: I am referring to the Virgil of the Divine Comedy that accompanies Dante in his passage through Hell and Purgatory. The companion, who would fall into the category of what some scholars call assistant or ally, usually plays a major role in the recognition ("anagnorisis") experienced by the protagonists.
One of the companions taken from films I remember most fondly is Alfredo, the projectionist of that beautiful and moving Italian film in homage to cinema, entitled *Cinema Paradiso".
Greetings.
Really interesting post, I never thought of Sam as the main character in Lord of the Rings, if he is the main character then the lines are blurred as you say. I think it's safe to say that a lot of these sidekicks are actually essential to the main storyline.
As a follower of @followforupvotes this post has been randomly selected and upvoted! Enjoy your upvote and have a great day!
Donkey from Shrek!
