There is thing you said that I am still learning about platforms like hive :D I didn’t understood all maybe cause my English lol but anyways enjoy your day 😘
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
There is thing you said that I am still learning about platforms like hive :D I didn’t understood all maybe cause my English lol but anyways enjoy your day 😘
I think the basis of all this is morally, if content curation were not a business that has been reserved for "curation teams", trails, etc., it would be logical for 20, 30 or 100 individuals to vote honest and the one who does not like his Downvote therefore, but that rewards possibly only one person gave it, on behalf of 50 who did not even see the photo and who might not even agree that it is good content.
I do not think it is a personal attack, however it is unfair that you can be the protection of a "user with power" who manages the vote of others (conspiranoia) and together squeeze the pool of rewards while we all watch without using the only method we have to do it.