You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Consider The Oak

in #majestic7 years ago

by saying "fucking" "overrated" to your own productions you downvaluated yourself. and u did so to get attention i suppose, so maybe some would say : oh no its perfect. though you could have said : here is the drawing, and here are the reasons i made it. i despise this whole system of voting for others talent or legitimacy (with money). and the fact that this money is void is even more mindtorturing.

Sort:  

If said money is void what is there to be upset about? Your argument could be applied to any social media platform, likes/upvotes/whatevers taking the obvious replacement in terms of currency.

the only semblence of legitimate argument I could generously mould out of our swamp exchange was something like ranking individuals "worth" with blatant monetary value is rather strange and vaguely unsettling, in which case i say "yeah"

its valid for many social network.
id come with a "eah"
whatever

oh and by saying over rated, you actually over rated it, as nobody has did it before.
therefore it is not overrated as nobody do care about it. (maybe i did somehow)

here comes the kicker: that aint my tee (it's sourced). this post is nonsense.

when did i say it is your tree.
it is your post. and you post for earning fakeesdollars.
why did u even post this shitty drawing?
and if u click on the source : the are no comments, so nobody is rating nor overrating this shit but you

Ah I see, a tree-drawing enthusiast. I think this has all been a misunderstanding; Mith's beef is with oak trees, not with this picture of species-unknown tree.

true

strong trollin