As wikipedia loses credibility, propagandists have sought for other ways to sidestep the claims of others and twist information. Google and Facebook promote Snopes as pre-eminent among these. Sadly this is disinformation. Snopes has many tools to subvert information towards its globalist agenda. The easiest of these to spot is "attacking a strawman."
In short what Snopes often do is take the opponents argument, exaggerate it and then 'debunk' the exaggeration. Here's an example:
So people who called George Soros a Nazi were wrong and Snopes has proved the accusers liars? Right?
Wrong. That was never the accusation. The credible accusation was different. Factually, George Soros collaborated with the Nazis, helping confiscate the property of other Jews. And he did describe this as 'the happiest time of my life.' If you look carefully at the Snopes article you'll find they're forced to lie about his collaboration, claiming that "At no time did he confiscate (or help confiscate) the property of Jews". This is directly refuted in the 1998 60 minutes interview in which he openly admits that was what he did in the war and, by his own admission, enjoyed so much.
So why lie? Well take a look at the following...
Having such a man bankroll the majority of the regressive left organisations (antifa, BLM, femen etc) might create cognitive dissonance in all his followers, so they lie about it. Anything liked to his funding is banned in Hungary, Russia and now Austria and numerous politicians have called for him to be arrested.
Luckily for those with their eyes open, his true character isn't hard to discern.
Curated for #informationwar (by @openparadigm)
Relevance:Fake Fact Checking
https://steemit.com/news/@ura-soul/the-owner-of-snopes-com-truth-and-fact-checking-website-used-by-facebook-and-paid-off-by-monsanto-is-in-court-could-be-shut-down
Ill just leave this here.