Here I thought you were a okay guy. I think you have that backwards. The transparencybot is making everyone aware of who are the scoundrels raking over the system. It isn't always about quality either, there are people in this world with learning disabilities who try their hardest on this platform. Trash post have nothing to do with people who are trying their hardest to put their best foot forward and be accepted into the community just like everyone else and they deserve that consideration. Now I must go unfollow you, the air in here is so insufferable I can't breathe.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I don't understand what this has to do with my comment. I like transparencybot, and I also think it's fun to write a little bit of ongoing fiction in response to its comments. I'm not downvoting it, and if it changes its boilerplate to identify Minnowbooster as a non-bid bot I'll start upvoting it every time.
Totally agree!
Besides, transparencybot might not be following the "real scoundrels raking over the system" @sunlit7 talks about
If it's on the transparency bots list there's a reason and usually that reason is it's enabling authors to take to much money out of the rewards pool. I didn't bring it up on the first post I read by you because I was impressed by how you followed up with everyone who had a comment or question, but the reality is that fair play must be in play to ensure the platform maintains stability and that there's more to go around for everyone, especially those struggling. Sure you can debate that there are a lot more people abusing the system for larger gains but those wrongs don't justify something as right. Like I've told others, I don't blame you for using bots. Otherwise it really doesn't pay to author post, I've seen people on here who have been here for a year writing good stuff making less then ten bucks. Most reporters don't make what some people are gaining from bot use...if people want the system to survive everyone has to be more considerate in the amounts they are taking out.
I appreciate your position but I believe your understanding of the platform is flawed.
Okay, to put it more bluntly....what you wrote isn't worth what you got paid for it. I am by far not understanding the platform. Almost everyday someone writes an article on abuse....you are abusing, not as bad as some but it's still abuse. Flip it, turn it, flop it anyway you want to try and justify it you still took more than what your post was worth.