This Armstrong guy - I assume part of his fraud charges were due to the fact that he named his organization "Princeton," which is a blatant reference to the reputable Princeton University despite the fact that he wasn't even remotely affiliated with the university. You really think that someone who employs disingenuous tactics like that is on the up-and-up?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I don't really think it's a capital offense as much as you do. I kind of look at the argument more than the other stuff.
If his arguments are good, why does he try to trick people into trusting him?
It just doesn't pass my sniff test. No capital offense, just extremely suspicious.
That's fine. Valid argument.