The problem with this thought is the word "rich".
There are two classes we could call rich.
- The group who is at the forefront of making things work. Always innovating. Entrepreneurs.
- The group of leaches. Such as Zeros and Buffette who make money by controlling the money. How much money could you make if you could borrow money at 0% interest and lend it for whatever you could get? How much money could you make on the stock market if you had both inside information and enough money to move the market?
Darryl Robert Schoon has much more information on the topic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/SchoonWorks/videos
Interesting video. As for as the statement as a trend predictor I don't think it matters where money comes from good or bad - what it is being spent on is the trend spotter.
Perfect! How can we define "rich" in a world that a few control literally, how the money flow. A few that LEND money to the gov's world wide, and that them the gov's have to pay enormous interested rates.
Successful humans are not necessary rich. They are happy with what they produce.