Censorship of free speech is unconstitutional. No private company or person is qualified to censor another private person. It doesn't matter that they own the website. The constitution doesn't say "You have freedom of speech BUT other people can shut you up if they don't like your speech".
Google is so big it has become a internet utility company. Imagine your electricity provider shutting of your power because you have so called controvertial views and you use electricity yo create videos etc.
We would never accept that. Why is it being accepted with google?
Censorship of free speech is unconstitutional. No private company or person is qualified to censor another private person. It doesn't matter that they own the website. The constitution doesn't say "You have freedom of speech BUT other people can shut you up if they don't like your speech".
Google is so big it has become a internet utility company. Imagine your electricity provider shutting of your power because you have so called controvertial views and you use electricity yo create videos etc.
We would never accept that. Why is it being accepted with google?
Yes, agreed. But so often a company that big can get away with these things. We have steemit and Dtube as alternative and we need to support it