Thanks for your insight and detailed answer - it is for a starter always good to hear different views!
The problem (I think) is only that the "minion" vote-power is then way too less if the mass should do the work. That was more or less the reason I wrote this post as unrelated content started to dominate niches - and not even niches, also the top topics. I think it should be work of all of us, not only one group - but when the whales are missing you can forget all as it is useless and has no effective result.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I must agree that curation reward for curation needs tuning , else our efforts compared to payouts are way to low.
I remember finding:
https://steemit.com/introduceyourself/@rubybian/hi-steemit-i-am-ruby
in something like first 20 minutes and being 6-th voter acording to this
https://steemd.com/@rubybian?page=3
and my prize was
curation reward of 0.006 STEEM POWER for rubybian/hi-steemit-i-am-ruby
System is in place and it works just needs tuning. My voting power at that time was maybe low and I was experimenting with voting time. Her blog earned $1,675.07 But even if I found it at perfect spot my reward would still be insignificant since i earn more than that from inflation or interest (not sure which one pumps my steempower, maybe both do).
In a way its like incentive for us to invest more in our steempower but then it is hard to invest if u don't realy believe in it to work i even see that people comming in get 5 SP and i got 10 SP when i singed in. But I hope things will go for better.