You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Steemit's Biggest Investment Problem - The Cost/Benefit Analysis Reward Curve

in #money8 years ago (edited)

Have thought about it a few times. And it is difficult to change because of the way it was set up to work.

One account one vote, but that could make the big SP owners Power Down. Allthough 90℅ of the available Steem created by the network allready is divided amongst the Steem Power holders.

This way curation would be decoupled from Steem Power. And the Steem Power owners would be pure investors. For which they constantly would be rewarded.

Then content providers could chose if they want to invest also their complete payouts. Or just the part that gets added after payout.

The difference in voting could be done by using the slider and the actuall voting Power. And that would be free choice related. It will give a Different kind of payout pattern.

And also because Steem Power would only concern investment and the return on that you'd have a free choice there too.

First I thought this could not work, but after some recent investigations I think this is possible.

It will keep the large stakeholders happy and those who don't have much SP.

At least that is how I see it right now as being an Easy fix that would seperate attention creation from investment.

Have a good weekend!

Sort:  

Interesting thought :) Thanks, you too!