A new lawsuit filed on behalf of several Atheist plaintiffs argues the phrase "In God We Trust" on U.S. money is unconstitutional, and calls for the government to get rid of it.
Sacramento attorney Michael Newdow filed the lawsuit Monday in Akron, Ohio. He'd unsuccessfully sued the government at least twice challenging the use of the phrase "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance.
Throughout much of his lawsuit, the word appears as "G-d."
Related Image
Michael Newdow, who challenged the words "under God" inthe Pledge of Allegiance, discusses his appeal of a state law requiring him to contribute to his opponents legal fees in the custody battle over his daughter, in Sacramento, Calif., Monday, May 17, 2004. Newdow, representing himself, told a three judge panel of the 3rd DistrictCout of Appeal that he should not have to pay for attorneys to "take away my child," in his custody dispute with Sandra Banning, the girl's mother. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli)Expand / Contract
Michael Newdow in 2004. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli)
Newdow claims "In God We Trust" violates the separation of church and state. One plaintiff says his Atheism is "substantially burdened because he is forced to bear on his person a religious statement that causes him to sense his government legitimizing, promoting and reinforcing negative and injurious attitudes not only against Atheists in general, but against him personally."
The lawsuit represents 41 plaintiffs from Ohio and Michigan, including many unnamed parents and children who are atheists or are being raised as atheists. Defendants include Congress, Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew and various federal agencies.
A message seeking comment was left Wednesday at the office of U.S. attorney for Ohio's northern district.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Unless the US dollar were to return to its Constitutional standard, then I agree that the word god should not be on federal reserve notes.