The same way a book is still a book if a person can't read, that is still money. It's worthless in that context but it still exists.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The same way a book is still a book if a person can't read, that is still money. It's worthless in that context but it still exists.
If a tree falls in a forest but you can't hear the tree falling, nor seeing it, did it really fall?
Btw, I'm not arguing for the sake of arguing, there's a deeper meaning to all of these.
In objective reality the tree does fall and it makes a sound. But that's going into quantum superposition stuff that may be a bit too deep for describing the construct of money.
I enjoy our dialogue. I really want to see your take on money in the next post :)