It is certainly true that each chapter could be expanded into a book on its own.
I state that the end doesn't justify the means, but apparently you believe it does.
I state that tyranny aims to prevent people from changing the system and reaching a new consensus and you "LOL", presumably you believe that a tyranny would never attempt to prevent people from replacing the system.
You suggest that people should not have the right to secede, which implies a desire to dominate. I get it, under the law of the jungle if you can prevent others from "leaving" you make yourself stronger. But I argue that you no longer have democracy or consent of the governed.
I LOL because there is a conundrum that seems to be unanswered.
Seceding to do what, and preventing what? You will just be setting up another order that people will find fault in. I'd have expected your experience of getting chased away several times to resonate with this.
The experiment is the current system. It will remain so until implosion. There are several apparatuses you stated that could be work on to improve it. You don't want to tackle individual components of the whole. You rather be nuclear.