basically, a bot which upvotes a post without a human intervention to read it and approve the upvote, is a cheat mechanism. Would a leader who was voted into office by people who had taken money in exchange for a vote, be considered an honest person who could be followed? I consider any content or provider of content such as that, as being a person who is not worthy of my support (little as it may be). The acceptance of this type of behaviour on this platform will eventually lead to the total ruining of the content and the site as a whole. I have found some good content upvoted by these bots, but in principle I will not follow such writers regardless of the merits of their content.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: