That makes perfect sense. I forgot about waveform generation when wondering what was so inefficient when it comes to RAM usage. Could this possibly be remedied with a browser extension (or CLI uploader or something)? With a user defined IPFS node, I could just use a VM with enough RAM defined for the upload to an IPFS node on my local network without having to jump through extra hoops to keep the data online after uploading.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Thanks for the ideas, noted down! :) This will have to be improved, so will put some thoughts on that soon...