I was unfamiliar with the term snarge, but I am pretty familiar with what it refers to, and that is, the remains of whatever particular animal (bird, deer, sea life) you're referring to after it collides with a plane, car or some other fast moving vehicle.
When you say, "take away their habitat," I understand you to mean the animals' habitat, and perhaps in a sarcastic way, since, arguably, at least part of their habitat has already been taken or at least invaded for periods of time in order for any of this carnage to take place.
With roads being built, there's been a definite "eminent domain" imposed by humans on previously solely used and occupied animal environments. With planes, though, there's more of a shared space, in the same way a predator bird might 'share' the space with a herbivore fowl.
What's the answer for any of this?
Without knowing everything there is to know about the situation, I can only guess at a few things, and the main idea I can think of would be to somehow 'warn' the animals of oncoming vehicles. Apparently, road noise or the din of jet engines isn't enough to do it.
It seems like in some instances some kind of higher frequency noise in the range only animals could hear (if that applies to more than just dogs) that would emit well ahead of a road vehicle could work, to warn off the critters. I'm not sure if that works so well in the air, but maybe there's something that could.
Man and animal could do a way better job of co-exising, with the onus obviously on us to accomplish it. Maybe it continues as it is for a couple more decades until someone comes up with that mode of travel that doesn't infringe on the wanderings of wildlife. A teleporter, or space elevator, or something else that doesn't require an accelerated battering ram.
I was unfamiliar with the term snarge, but I am pretty familiar with what it refers to, and that is, the remains of whatever particular animal (bird, deer, sea life) you're referring to after it collides with a plane, car or some other fast moving vehicle.
When you say, "take away their habitat," I understand you to mean the animals' habitat, and perhaps in a sarcastic way, since, arguably, at least part of their habitat has already been taken or at least invaded for periods of time in order for any of this carnage to take place.
With roads being built, there's been a definite "eminent domain" imposed by humans on previously solely used and occupied animal environments. With planes, though, there's more of a shared space, in the same way a predator bird might 'share' the space with a herbivore fowl.
What's the answer for any of this?
Without knowing everything there is to know about the situation, I can only guess at a few things, and the main idea I can think of would be to somehow 'warn' the animals of oncoming vehicles. Apparently, road noise or the din of jet engines isn't enough to do it.
It seems like in some instances some kind of higher frequency noise in the range only animals could hear (if that applies to more than just dogs) that would emit well ahead of a road vehicle could work, to warn off the critters. I'm not sure if that works so well in the air, but maybe there's something that could.
Man and animal could do a way better job of co-exising, with the onus obviously on us to accomplish it. Maybe it continues as it is for a couple more decades until someone comes up with that mode of travel that doesn't infringe on the wanderings of wildlife. A teleporter, or space elevator, or something else that doesn't require an accelerated battering ram.
View this answer on Musing.io