Strap yourselves in kids, down the rabbit hole and through the looking glass we go. Let's take a moment to examine the Left's favorite boogie man, the ultimate evil in the Universe, no not Hitler ... white people.
Now... where would this little BLM member at Harvard University get the idea's and rhetoric which he is spewing forth when he claims whites have no inherent value and should be killed or commit suicide for the cause?
Muslim Professor at CA University: “Genocide” of White Racists “Morally Required”
Prof laments 'insidiousness of silence and whiteness' in academia
Professor teaches students about ‘the problem that is whiteness’
New York public college offering course called 'Abolition of Whiteness'
Patriotism is ‘drenched in whiteness’, alleged Professor
Berkeley professor to race conference: ‘Whiteness is inherently violent’
University of Memphis professor: ‘Whiteness is most certainly and inevitably terror’
'Abolition of Whiteness' course offered at Hunter College
New Mexico College Launches Study Group To Confront “Depravity Of Whiteness”
Trinity College professor calls white people ‘inhuman’: ‘Let them f-ing die’
And my personal favorite...
Colorado Professor: “Whiteness Is a Disease”
Funny thing about Leftist / Liberals dehumanizing white people. Allow me to point out that the first world nations are the most technologically developed, industrialized and freest in the world.
With civil liberties enforced by an independent court which provides due process of law to the accused. Generous Government assistance programs to help the poor, elderly, infirmed and disabled. Social safety nets to aid those who are having hard times financially with regards to employment.
Complex infrastructure with the highest proportion of heated / cooled and electrified homes. Along with telecommunication, media broadcasting and internet access throughout most areas. Modern conveniences like flush toilets linked to well maintained sewage disposal systems.
It is the first world nations which so much of the third world seems eager to migrate to, en mass. Specifically for one reason: civilization.
The only places on earth to have civil liberties such as due process of law, freedom of speech, freedom to practice religion of choice, freedom to engage in economic endeavors, generous social safety net and representational government are those places established by, controlled by, or colonized by Indo-Europeans.
There are no such examples of Representational Republics like the above stated, anywhere in the world, which were not founded by, controlled by or colonized by Indo-Europeans.
In the Americas: only the USA and Canada represent the above.
In Africa, there existed at one time several nations which could boast as much: yet as the locals pushed out or slaughtered the Indo-Europeans (I.E. South Africa, The Congo, Zimbabwe/Rhodesia) they descended, in less than a generation, into tribal warfare, ethnic cleansings, genocides or dictatorships.
In Asia, the only representative nations of the above are South Korea, who's government was re-made into a Western Representational Republic after the Korean war and Japan, who's government was re-made into a Western Representational Republic after world war 2.
Civil liberties guaranteed by the code of law, enforced by an independent court system to ensure the essential freedoms of the individual is the philosophical goal of western civilization: which is why it is only western civilization which has built first world nations.
The fact of the matter is, fully realized modernity with it's infrastructure and technological accomplishments has only been achieved by providing the individual with freedom to think, freedom to dream and freedom to act. Which exists no where but those geographical locations tread upon by Indo-Europeans. Meaning: whites.
The Enlightenment values of personal liberty, logic and reason were only developed in Europe and exist only places which became either dominated by, controlled by or congregated by Indo-Europeans.
Western enlightenment values come from Indo-European peoples. From European Philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, Descartes, Voltaire, Locke, Aquinas, Bastiat.
No where else in the world: do western enlightenment values spring up aside from where Indo-European's tread the ground. Which is precisely why the first world, the freest and most advanced civilization on this planet: exists only in places where western enlightenment values were spread.
First World Nations.
~There are no first world nations in Africa.
~There are no first world nations in South America.
~There are no first world nations in Asia aside from Japan and South Korea which both adopted western principles.
~There are no first world nations in the middle east aside from Israel, which was founded and populated mainly by Jews who migrated there from western nations and took with them western principles.
All of the above I have stated: are irrefutable facts. Disdain them if you will, hate me if you so desire, it will not change reality.
From western enlightenment, created by Indo-Europeans, came sparkling civilization which believes in personal liberty, logic and reason.
A civilization which has been under constant attack by those who are unable to duplicate it: but hungry to steal it from without or malign it from within.
Leftist ideology from the Frankfurt school (Post Modernism / Cultural Marxism) has been used to utterly indoctrinate children into believing that the west and everything about western philosophy, history and ideology is innately evil.
One of my favorite authors referred to this as "Hatred of the good, for being the good."
Since so much of the anti-european, anti-white sentiment comes from black ethnocentrists and black nationalists, the cudgel of "but slavery" should be addressed here in this article as well. I'm going to take some texts from a few of my other articles including "Ungrateful Bastards".
"All of western civilization owes it’s continued existence to the slavs – and have they thanked us for this? Never. Worse, because it was slavs who fought the muslims to a stand still, it was slavs who were most often captured or stolen by the muslims.
So what came of that? If you look up the etymology of the word: in English, the word “slave” comes directly from the word “slav”, in eternal insult to the fact that it was we who bore the burden of saving western civilization. It was MY people who made all of modernity possible, and not only have we not been thanked, we are forever reminded of the fact that we were enslaved that others be free…"
The Sub Saharan Africans (blacks) who want to cry "muh slavery" ad nauseum - get no white guilt from me. More than once I've explained to them the meaning of the word slave. "When your people became slaves, when they were 'enslaved' - it means they were treated as being no better - than my people. How awful for you."
Allow me to enlighten you, for the BLM'ish among the readers. Observe if you will: America, South America, Various tropical islands like Jamaica all have sizable black populations do they not? In spite of ideology - your eyes do in fact function and you will not deny blatant reality right? Do you also observe that there are no large black populations in Muslim Arab or Muslim Persian majority countries?
The Arab and Persian slave trade of Sub-Saharan Africans existed for hundreds of years previous to Indo-Europeans engaging in it and lasted long after Indo-Europeans outlawed slavery in their territories. Yet there are aren't large populations of Sub-Saharan Africans in Muslim Arab or Persian countries. Why do you think that is?
Nearly all slaves in Islamic territories who were male were automatically subjected to castration and emasculation, both simultaneously. No crime necessary, it wasn't a punitive act for a criminal offense - it was standard practice. They didn't just remove the testes but the penis as well and the brutality with which it was done often killed the male slaves in the process. While female slaves were preferably unmarked, male slaves fetched a much higher price as Eunuchs. The number of male slaves who died as a result were simply the overhead costs of a business venture due to the price those who survived would fetch at market.
More to the point, where - on Earth - do you find a slave trade still actively engaged in?
That's right, just about everywhere BUT Western Nations populated by majority Indo-Europeans (meaning majority whites). Especially prevalent, by the way, in what regions of the globe? Africa and Muslim majority nations.
In the United States, according to the 1860 Census (during the civil war) there were only about 4 million people living in slavery. In Sub-Saharan Africa TODAY the Global Slavery Index estimates estimates there to be approximately 6,245,800 slaves. With another additional 2,936,800 slaves in The Middle East and North Africa.
You want to talk about slavery and privilege? You are privileged to be the descendants of Sub-Saharan Africans who were transported to Western nations populated by Indo-Europeans rather than to Islamic nations populated by Muslims: Africans slaves who destination were Arab or Persian Nations, have few, if any, descendants today. Again, there are no large populations of Sub-Saharan Africans in Arab or Persian territories because the male slaves were routinely castrated and emasculated. The only Muslim territories of the globe which do have large populations of Sub-Saharan Africans: are where Islam converted the locals.
More to the point, you do not GET to lecture or speak down to Indo-Europeans about slavery: which ended over a hundred-and-fifty years ago in the United States, and was ended BY Indo-Europeans, when AFRICA TODAY engages in a much larger slave trade than even existed at the time of the American Civil War. You even attempt bringing up "muh slavery" to me and I will shove your nose in the fact that Africa today has more slaves than the United States did during the civil war.
On - top - of - that: the United Nations was formed in 1945. In 1949, after a truly astonishing volume of deliberation, legalese, alterations, changes, arguments over verbiage, committees, sub committees, and all the efficiency of attempting to kick water up hill - the UN managed to outlaw slavery world wide. The International Day for the Abolition of Slavery, December 2nd, marks the date of the adoption, by the General Assembly, of the United Nations Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others (resolution 317(IV) of December 2nd 1949).
Long after all of the Indo-European nations had individually, within their borders, abolished the slave trade: it was the western world which had finally dragged the rest of the globe into agreeing to also abolish slavery. In spite of those agreements which make it ILLEGAL under International Law, slavery still exists to this day. Where does slavery still exist in large numbers, you may ask?
Everywhere EXCEPT Western nations.
You want to complain that we had slaves for a short period of time over a hundred and fifty years ago: I say why don't you go free the slaves owned by Africans today? Oh wait, nothing to be gained by doing that - you were just looking for a convenient cudgel to try and ideologically bash me with. Yeah, that didn't work for you now did it?
"White people used to own slaves" - yeah, over a hundred and fifty years ago and they owned less slaves then than black Africans own today. May wish to stop throwing stones at me from within that glass house, you're the one who has to replace the window panes, not me. However, while you're busy picking up that shattered glass, don't forget those were slaves who were purchased from and sold by Black Africans. A slave trade which was later not just ended within Indo-European White Nations, but abolished in all sectors of the globe in which Indo-European Whites traveled because the British Navy waged war on the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. At a cost of Billions of pounds in today's currency, the coffers which paid for such were provided by the tax revenues of Indo-European Whites, for no other reason than that the British thought it was right to do so.
Also according to the Global Slavery Index and reported on by the German news organization Deutsche Welle.
The worst offender on a per capita basis is Mauritania, which, in 1981, was the last country to outlaw slavery. The practice was only criminalized there in 2007. Some 10 to 20 percent of the country’s 3.4 million residents are enslaved, according to estimates.
Sub Sharan-Africans engaged in the slave trade for thousands of years before Indo-Europeans ever began buying them. More over, not only did Indo-European nations individually abolish slavery before the rest of the globe but it was Indo-Europeans who pushed to make the practice of slavery Illegal. Where slavery exists today: it is an illegal act under International Law and it's left to international organizations like the United Nations to try and stamp out the practice.
Did you watch that whole video above "African Holocaust: The Islamic Slave Trade" ? Did you see in the second half where Mr. Tidiane Ndiaye spoke about the French Colonization of Senegal? When he stated that is precisely the French Colonization of Senegal which put an end to the Arab Muslim slave trade there? That it was French Colonel Archinal who set up freedom villages for captives who managed to escape Arab Muslim slave traders?
Oh but do please tell me some more about the unparalleled evils of Colonization in Africa, I'd be fascinated to hear the mental gymnastics used to exclaim how the French should not have colonized Senegal. How they should simply have left the Arab slave traders there to butcher the men through barbaric compulsory mutilation. Please do tell me how evil those french white people were to put an end to black African women being sold as sex slaves. Then there's that indefensible Colonel Archinal, setting up free towns for freed black Africans. Sticking his ugly, narrow, pale french nose in other people's business. How offensive of him to provide shelter, comfort, aid and protection from slavers like that, what an evil white devil he was.
A simple fact: whites didn't invent slavery - whites made slavery illegal and it is whites who are actively engaged in the fight to end slavery everywhere that it is practiced.
Quoting myself...
If you look up the etymology of the word: in English, the word “slave” comes directly from the word “slav”, in eternal insult to the fact that it was we who bore the burden of saving western civilization. It was MY people who made all of modernity possible, and not only have we not been thanked, we are forever reminded of the fact that we were enslaved that others be free…
When your people became slaves, when they were "enslaved" - it means they were treated as no better - than my people. How awful for you.
It was not western civilization (whites) who first enslaved Sub-Saharan Africans (blacks) in great numbers: it was western civilization (whites) who freed Sub-Saharan Africans (blacks), a thankless task, for which we are still engaged in to this day.
If you were born into an Indo-European country as a result of slavery: thank a white person that you are free. There are many Africans born into slavery, still, to this day. Many more who are being caged, trafficked and solid as slaves in open air slave markets, in African nations, such Libya, at this very moment.
So from where I sit: it is YOU who are "privileged."
Since we're now in the arena of race relations, by the way. the next narrative to be destroyed should be how often black people are killed by whites. The whole BLM debacle. Fine, fine. Let's examine that shall we? Oh Look, I've made a handy graphic for you. To see a close up click here.
That's right boys, girls and those who identify as mayonnaise or attack helicopters. I conducted a 10 year study of the FBI's Uniform Crime Report, what is INTERNATIONALLY considered the gold standard of criminal statistics. So much so, that International criminal investigation organization like Interpol actually send their people to learn the methodology used by the FBI in publishing the Uniform Crime Report.
The UCR is created by collecting all criminal reports and data from all law enforcement agencies in the United States. from your local cop shop, to county sheriffs, state troopers and every branch office of federal agencies as well. All of that data is then parsed and divided up into a plethora of analytical tables. By city, region, type of crime, and every other analytic you could imagine. included: is race of offender and race of victim.
For all the bluster from ideologues in BLM: during this ten year period - blacks killed 2.28 times more whites than the number of blacks killed by whites; in spite of the fact that whites out number blacks in the USA 4.63 to 1. I also put that side by side with the number of US casualties (all races) killed in Iraq during that same time period, just for the sake of comparison.
Using an actual, ongoing, literal WAR, and the years of heaviest fighting in that WAR as a control: it is more dangerous for a white person to live in America anywhere near blacks than it is for a US service member of any race to fight in the Iraq War.
Lets see now... Muh Slavery - that narratives quite demolished. Teh whitey be killins us yo - that narrative goes up in flames.
I actually had a BLM supporter try to bring up lynchings in the US. He didn't cite his source and I didn't even bother to double check the validity of his source. This is how one sided the conversation was. I did not bother to check his source to see if the numbers he provided were accurate or not. I screen capped and archived the tweets - you can see and verify for yourself.
Again: 1) he didn't cite his sources, 2) I didn't even bother to question where he got his numbers from, and 3) between the "3,450 to 3,960" estimation he provided: I used the highest estimate as comparison. Again, screen captured and archived - you are free to verify these tweets and this discourse actually occurred. I invite you to do so.
That's also why all of the Uniform crime Reports in the graphic further up are archived. Aside from the 2004 UCR: the FBI was still publishing the reports as pdf's at that time: so it's a short link instead. You cannot use archive.is for pdf files. Source is still cited. I don't argue using rhetoric, I don't engage in propaganda. Everything you have seen and read here is provided for you, with citations and direct links to where the information can be found.
Now, I'm perfectly aware that I am going to be labeled alt-right or a nazi or yadda yadda yadda. A whole myriad of insults and slanders for publishing all of this information which is contrary to the popular narratives today.
Here's the thing: I don't advocate for two tier legal structures or second class citizens. I think blacks should be provided every right which white people have in America. In spite of what factual evidence shows about black on white violence. The reason I put out this information is not to remove or support the removal of basic human rights from blacks: it's to oppose the narratives supported by Liberals, Feminists, Social justice Warriors and Black Lives Matter in their lobbying attempts at establishing a two tiered system of law.
If you haven't read my article "Political Abandonment": I'll report the juicier bits here.
"I’ll give you a practical example; me, being a classical liberal, a strict constitutionalist – am a centrist. Here’s the banner which adorns my twitter, minds and youtube pages.
“I support the establishment of a Rule of Law which provides complete equality before the law: equal rights, equal protections and equal punishments. That no one person is permitted to be infringed upon by any other person or group there of, which includes infringement by the State. A law in which civil liberties, personal liberties and human rights are sacrosanct.
No second class citizens, no special privileges, no special protections. Everyone treated equally before the law and their individual rights / civil liberties protected BY the law: against the malevolence of others or even against the state itself.”
When I publish all of this information regarding the truth about Indo-Europeans (whites), the truth about slavery and the truth about black on white violence it isn't in support of demoting blacks to being second class citizens. I am confronting the leftist narratives which they spread in favor of demoting Indo-Europeans (whites) to second class citizens.
I publish verifiably factual information which dispels popular mythos and propagandic narratives. This is a direct confrontation to those who wish to use rhetoric to deny the rights of others. Or to establish for themselves double standard laws written in their favor.
What I advocate for, is exactly what you see in the quote for my article "Political Abandonment", equal rights.
What I advocate against: is all those who advocate for special privileges, special protections, special exemptions, preferential treatment and two tier legal systems which promote some groups to being first class citizens and demote other groups to being second class citizens.
Those people, persons, groups and organizations who DO advocate for special privileges, special protections, special exemptions, preferential treatment and two tier legal systems which promote some groups to being first class citizens and demote other groups to being second class citizens: are anti-freedom and anti-equality.
No matter how they define themselves or what they define themselves as, even if they claim to be Feminists and the dictionary definition of feminism is all about equality: the dictionary definition of "an advocate of the supremacy of a particular group, especially one determined by race or sex" is a "supremacist."
If you're advocating for or lobbying for superior rights to be given to a group or groups OVER THAT of another group or groups: you are categorically, unabashedly and undeniably, by definition, a supremacist.
It's a simple concept really and it goes utterly unnoticed.
As far as I can see the majority of anti-whites are in fact white.
I'm white.
How dare they demean my race!!
If they really think it's not OK to be white, then I suggest the get rid of themselves immediately if not sooner.