About to shoot out the door in a sec and back at the computer in a few hours. I love some of the concepts you have suggested and I agree, we could use a larger founders group. In my life I have worked in a number of roles from military to working in public service/health care and I have always seen the best results in any organised effort when each individual has an area of responsibility and duties and details to stick to relevant to their aor. I have been blown away by the touch you have brought to this initiative and the unbelievable impact you have had. This is more a combination of marketing, sales, and understanding structuring creative projects in a way that I think you know far more about than I ever could. What I'd love to know your thoughts on so we can keep running at great speed is pretty much everything you outlined in your previous message. You had sound points throughout. The big ones that come to mind as I write this are:
1: Structure. I'm going to need your help and know for a fact that you will have far better ideas than myself on this. Subcommittees and large founders groups are clearly the way forward so as much detail as you can relay on what you envision there and how you feel it will take shape, evolve, and altogether grow under a system that ensures fairness to the new users and helps our efforts to grow.
- You're undeniably correct in the fact I need to think bigger here. In regards to us potentially getting whale votes or large finance occurring, I am all ears and completely willing to defer to your judgement here. I'm a clinician by profession so marketing is not a strong point. You are clearly the wiser head here so I'm incredibly eager and excited to hear what ideas you have on this.
I really look forward to hearing from you today, and can't express my gratitude enough for the awesome impact you are having on my humble idea.