You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: [dTube] Trump Blocks Release of Dem Memo on Russia Probe

in #news7 years ago

What crime is President Trump obstructing investigation of?

IIRC he sent it back to the Intelligence Committee because there were sources and methods unredacted in the memo.

In your opinion, are there any crimes worth investigating out of the last administration? If so, which?

Sort:  

Leaving comments asking for votes, follows, or other self promotional messages could be seen as spam.

Your Reputation Could be a Tasty Snack with the Wrong Comment!

Thank You! ⚜

Whataboutism at it's finest.

So I'm late here obviously, but how about those 13 indictments for Russians interfering in the elections?

But we should really be talking about the last president right? Oh, but not the one before him right?

Justice done though the heavens may fall... regardless of how many presidents ago.

That said -- re-read my statement:

What crime is President Trump obstructing investigation of?

Are you implying that the indictment indicates that then Candidate Trump was coordinating with those 13 Russians or their handlers in order to "interfere" in the election?

That's not what I read.

To reiterate, yes we should be talking about the last president since there are plenty of things worthy of investigation. Among those, whether the White House knew/approved of the FISA warrants listening to an American citizens' communications, particularly when they're your political enemies.

Sure, investigating the current President's possible conspiracy with a hostile foreign power is only as important as determining if the previous president knew warrants were being approved.

the-morphing-of-the-russiagate-narrative-as-per-hannity-no-25695585.png

i-cant-defend-trump-on-this-topic-soillbringuphillary-clinton-or-21449896.png

So sitting presidents are technically allowed and encouraged to use the national intelligence monitoring tools on competing candidates during election campaigns. Got it.

I will remember you said that in 2020.

How many of your political heroes are compromised and blackmailed do you think? What do you think is held over them? Do you think any of them hold compromising material over others?

Time to show how old you really are.

That's not what I said.

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that a sitting President should absolutely have any candidate investigated if there is evidence of then conspiring with a foreign power.

To be clear, if the Steele dossier had implicated Hillary I would hope Obama would have investigated her.

What if Hillary actually committed actual crimes?

Like... improper storage and dissemination of classified documents. That shit ends careers for the little people in military and government.

But then you'd have to ask 'Why'd you destroy the hard drives and phones of you and your staff?'

But that would just be the start of the thread.

Why am I focused on Hillary Clinton? Because she and those around her committed crimes with assumed impunity. They know it. Many Americans know it. It appears President Trump knows it.

Again, I ask, how many of your political heroes have files on them inches thick? Who holds those files? Think its just democrat v republican? Go google Denny Hastert and tell me what sorts of things he's done in his political career to 'avoid negative news'? Want to make a bet in Steem that Adam Schiff gets rolled up at some point for something bad before the 2020 election? :)

For you it is clearly just Democrat vs. Republican. You don't seem to want Trump investigated while you want Hillary to be investigated for every single unfounded investigation Trump, Alex Jones and an army of Russian trolls made up.

I don't have political heroes. Nice try though.

Do I want to take a bet that Democrats will be accused of anything before the election? No, because they absolutely will be.

Because that is exactly the tactics Russia and the GOP just used successfully.