Not sure how you expect such a vague subject to be addressed in the comments section. All I have to say is that a lot of environmental degradation could be solved by protecting land/property rights. Like instead of giving pipeline companies eminent domain power to force themselves onto unwilling landowners, you could respect the landowners' title and liberals would have one less thing to bitch about. Protecting the land rights of indigenous tribes in places such as West Africa and the Amazon rain forest, instead of evicting them at gun point to set up so called protected areas, would get you closer to 'lower carbon emission' than allowing a criminal government to look after it. Conservation is best done by those who have a vested interest in their environment i.e. those who make a living off the land. That's true of the Baka in the Congo as well as family farms/ranches here in the U.S.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: