"on the surface your comment seems like crockpot pseudo-science."
Actually I didn't call you a crackpot rather I expressed that the ideas you were presenting SEEEMED like crackpot pseudo-science. I was letting you know that my bullshit censor was going off but if you had any truly mind expanding knowledge to share I would be open to reading it.
Let's be real your post was antagonistic from the outset by trying to label anyone that disagrees with you as 'easily manipulated' so spare me your delicate flower routine about being ridiculed. The fact that the word crackpot is such a trigger for you is very telling. It's obviously something you've encountered before and get easily offended over.
Anyways, you going to cough up a link or what?
i'm just enjoying the fact that you were in such a hurry to be right that you misspelled crackpot. go back and check.
i'm probably the least delicate flower with which you'll ever interact. you amuse me, you don't come close to offending me.
i've had plenty of disagreements with people i didn't think were easily manipulated, just not very many pro-vaccinators. i find that it takes a particular dullness of mind to believe the vaccine story for very long.
i definitely, don't share my most useful, life saving knowledge with people who use terms like pseudo-science, so no, no link for you. if you have a smidgen of open minded intelligence, maybe you can
ferret it out for yourself. good luck to you. thank you for assuaging my boredom for a few moments. ta ta.