I met a retired climate scientist at a Christmas party a few years ago, and he said pretty much what you are saying! He says that he is appalled by the bad science being bandied about today. Also, he says that it is a struggle for him to get published, because editors of magazines and books don't want to hear what he has to say!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The contradicting themselves is the almost as bad as the data manipulation.
They don't know that the "peer reviewed" part is a Catch 22. You can't be peer reviewed if you haven't been sponsored to publish you work in a peer review magazine and you won't get that, unless you are peer reviewed or go along with what they believe.
But, not as bad as the regular people not knowing that if a hypothesis fails at testing, then a scientist must reconsider their hypothesis and try again, not change their inputs or outputs to meet the hypothesis. So, the regular folk just go with what is being told to them and they only hear what is main stream and "peer reviewed".
Posting again, because STEEMit can't decided if I posted it or not.
Hehe! I tried to comment on another of your blogs about Steemit, but the comment wouldn't go! Very frustrating!
Trouble today, is that people don't know that they are not supposed to believe everything they see in print! LOL!
I'm already regretting doing this article due to STEEMit issues, but I figured I should get it out there before it gets stale.