I don't know, I don't think the injections have as much power over a person as is often described. Actually, I think it's even grist to the mill of a kind of omniscience and knowledge about life that I think is overstretched. To say that the injections cause irreversible damage is to ascribe to them the very properties that some feel compelled to believe in.
From my perspective, your article gives it an energy that I personally would not want to put into it. I don't see any infallible or watertight evidence from any side, basically one would not notice anything if the issue wasn't ridden like a horse over and over again.
I personally think it's a (accidentally) pro-publication on your part. Why? Because you are giving a forum to the voices that are convinced that power over the biology of our human bodies can indeed be achieved via genetics etc. Forgive me if I interpret it that way, so my question is: do you really think genetics can manipulate into the living like that?
But what if you follow the voices that talk about cell renewals in the body. New cells are always being formed and the belief that the code contained in them can be made by human hands in precision, reproduced in them, is for me like a belief that one can play the hand of God. If I tried to think it through to the last, I would be assuming a position of power over life as such. However, I do not believe in that.