Funny article. It is too bad, that judging whole groups of people on their attributes, not their acts now seems permissible in the mainstream--just as long as it is against the majoritarian tyrants of yore, as the mad libs points out.
I just don't get it with the anti gun statists. People can live in gun free cities tomorrow, that's what they don't realize. If we fully respected property rights and didn't let government claws come in to interfere with voluntary association, then people who want a gun free city could buy up property and make their utopia. And people want a gun full city can make theirs. With the government spying us all and treating us like cattle, I feel much safer knowing their are armed people on compounds, even though I particularly don't like guns and don't like being around them, except paintball guns.
I believe crooked H may have at one point wanted to repeal Heller. I find it very sad that so many statists want to extend tyranny to no fly no buy, want to make it so members of no fly list cannot purchase firearms. If consitutitonal right to have gun, as Heller might support, I'm not attorney, this not legal advice, then it seems putting people on a list with no public process about classification on the list and major hurdles to get off list would seem to instantly violate their rights.
How sad the statists want to put nails in the coffin of immutable constitutional rights and tradition and thresholds of beyond a reasonable doubt before state coercive action. I can't imagine how prohibition of firearms would work. But I guess it would be like drugs or prostitution. Just another racket, that instead of having markets and dialogue to let the market regulate at optimum levels instead, government makes laws no one follows then it puts it head in sand while people become felons and lose the right to vote while government kills and imprisons its own citizens for nonviolent conduct.