You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: City Forces Elderly Homeowner To Replace Garden with Grass Lawn Even Though She’s Allergic To It

in #news7 years ago

Their lawyer is incompetent.
The right the judge is refering to as not lusted is ex post facto protection.
If the garden existed before the law passed they are 'grandfathered in' by that provision in the law.
Every lawyer that signed it's name to that case needs to be disbarred.