I am not inclined to believe the official narrative of 9/11, but the alternative theories are all lacking in substance as well. Every question is usually plugged with an equally unsubstantiated conspiracy theory. It is essential in the search for truth to be even more skeptical of the answers given by those with whom you instinctively agree. Burden of proof is always on the one with the positive claim, and leaps of logic must be pointed out even more carefully. The falsehood of one story does not prove any of the alternatives offered.
Holy cow - I did all this in 2002 and took my webpage about 911 down in 2006 on the fifth anniversary because it was old news. There is new shit going on right now - this week - other fake news!
If you are really still hung up on 911, here it is all covered in under five minutes:
I'v been following 9/11 truth stuff since probably 2003 or 2004. One consistent problem I have always seen is confirmation bias. The official story has holes. Therefore pet theories are shoehorned in, and confirmation bias comes into play as the truther seeks supporting evidence and discards anything that doesn't match.
The strangest thing is we don't need to find the "smoking gun" on 9/11 to know government is wholly corrupt and bent on destruction. Whether the US government or some other shadowy organization was behind this specific event is largely irrelevant. But that makes it all the more important that we apply as rigorous a methodology as possible.
To which I would say: apply your focus to events that are happening right now, and keep in mind that the organisations running them are fully known - they are zionists headed by the house of rotchild, and all media and governments globally are controlled by them.
I note that the attack surface doesn't increase in size with payment size. Every release is going to have the same potential to compromise their security. Therefore they are utterly invulnerable to attack for the price of $250.
This makes no sense at all to me. Why even bother collecting such small sums?
Decades ago I did some consulting for a political action committee, and remember discussing fund raising with a principal there, who said "I don't write a letter for less than $500."
These guys have gone to a lot more trouble than just writing a letter. I don't think the BTC is their actual purpose at all, and the $250 BTC price for a key is a lot of why I think so.
There's another purpose for this psyop than BTC, even $2M of it. Hell, @ned could pay that and have the entire release posted to the blockchain without having to fire even one more Stinc employee.
That's a paltry sum to challenge the savage bastards that have turned the PNAC into geopolitical reality for decades without even one of their number taking a hit for the team. They're not doing it for money - and I don't think they're taking on that organization.
I am not inclined to believe the official narrative of 9/11, but the alternative theories are all lacking in substance as well. Every question is usually plugged with an equally unsubstantiated conspiracy theory. It is essential in the search for truth to be even more skeptical of the answers given by those with whom you instinctively agree. Burden of proof is always on the one with the positive claim, and leaps of logic must be pointed out even more carefully. The falsehood of one story does not prove any of the alternatives offered.
Holy cow - I did all this in 2002 and took my webpage about 911 down in 2006 on the fifth anniversary because it was old news. There is new shit going on right now - this week - other fake news!
If you are really still hung up on 911, here it is all covered in under five minutes:
I'v been following 9/11 truth stuff since probably 2003 or 2004. One consistent problem I have always seen is confirmation bias. The official story has holes. Therefore pet theories are shoehorned in, and confirmation bias comes into play as the truther seeks supporting evidence and discards anything that doesn't match.
The strangest thing is we don't need to find the "smoking gun" on 9/11 to know government is wholly corrupt and bent on destruction. Whether the US government or some other shadowy organization was behind this specific event is largely irrelevant. But that makes it all the more important that we apply as rigorous a methodology as possible.
To which I would say: apply your focus to events that are happening right now, and keep in mind that the organisations running them are fully known - they are zionists headed by the house of rotchild, and all media and governments globally are controlled by them.
One thing you are neglecting is that this is a current op.
Clearly The Fart Gaylord isn't simply extorting the architects of 9/11 for $250.
So, given your interest in current affairs, what is going on?
Thanks!
The payment plan put out by this hacker group starts at $250 for a tiny release and goes up to $2 million for the full release.
I note that the attack surface doesn't increase in size with payment size. Every release is going to have the same potential to compromise their security. Therefore they are utterly invulnerable to attack for the price of $250.
This makes no sense at all to me. Why even bother collecting such small sums?
Decades ago I did some consulting for a political action committee, and remember discussing fund raising with a principal there, who said "I don't write a letter for less than $500."
These guys have gone to a lot more trouble than just writing a letter. I don't think the BTC is their actual purpose at all, and the $250 BTC price for a key is a lot of why I think so.
There's another purpose for this psyop than BTC, even $2M of it. Hell, @ned could pay that and have the entire release posted to the blockchain without having to fire even one more Stinc employee.
That's a paltry sum to challenge the savage bastards that have turned the PNAC into geopolitical reality for decades without even one of their number taking a hit for the team. They're not doing it for money - and I don't think they're taking on that organization.
I think they are that organization.