Sort:  

Except a) that's not how burden of proof works and b) "He said the paperwork from ICE does not mention homicide. According to the family, he has no criminal history in Mexico, and we did our own search through Mexican channels and we didn’t find anything under his name,” Mr. Amaya said."

oh, so the murderer and the folks who were sheltering an illegal alien said that, they are way more credible than ICE, how come this article left out how this was a scheduled C-section?

a) Indeed, ICE's bees kidnapping legal residents of all kinds and is undergoing a lawsuit for slavery, so yeah, I don't trust them and b) you said "nobody denied that he was wanted for murder" the family and the lawyer did, perhaps you don't consider them persons, hence your claim of "nobody." Good luck with it, Bobby.

the family harbored a criminal and the lawyer is trying to keep one here. They are not people who are credible. Anyone can be sued for anything, sounds like a frivolous and irrelevant lawsuit. Why did they try to act like she was in labor instead of on the way to a planned C section?
a week later no one in the media has been able to prove that ICE was lying and this guy was an innocent victim?