I have debated with you. Why should I debate them all if it is already clear your list is flawed from the start?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I have debated with you. Why should I debate them all if it is already clear your list is flawed from the start?
You ask me to assemble a thousand stories. I take the time to do so. You find a couple that you don't agree with in the first hundred, and therefore refuse to read the other 900. I read each one of them. You should too.
I found out you didn't respect the rules, I called the bet off, yes.
Don't you think it is a shitty thing to do to ask someone to write something, even offer them money to write it, and then refuse to even read what you asked them to write?
Is it shitty?
How about not respecting the rules, is that not shitty at all?
If you feel I made mistakes, the logical and reasonable thing to do would be to point out the mistakes, then continue reading. Instead, you eagerly grabbed onto the first excuse you could find to exercise willful ignorance.
You are continuing to enact willful ignorance by refusing to respect the rules