No these were your exact words:
I could post a thousand articles and videos of police misconduct by white supremacist officers
screengrab:
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
No these were your exact words:
I could post a thousand articles and videos of police misconduct by white supremacist officers
screengrab:
You are doing exactly as I predicted. You are refusing to read each individual story, and you are avoiding and dismissing the evidence that shatters your claims.
If you think a white sheriff handing over a black man to a lynch mob is somehow not white supremacy, than you are obviously ignoring solid evidence and dismissing legitimate information.
I read as far as I could until I noted that your cases were not all about white officers assaulting on black victims. Edit: and mostly it is not clear if there's a racial motive.
Like I said, we can debate each case, or I can even just get a replacement case where the racism is egregious enough to meet your insanely tilted standards.
The fact of the matter is, it can be done. I could have found a thousand cases a month ago, and every day new cases are opened and closed. Had I actually believed you were sincere in your statement regarding this bet, I would have started this project a lot sooner.
Why do you want to do that now when you already got called for not providing what was asked? You had the chance and you blew it.
You were given explicit rules, and you didn't follow them.
I never had a chance to get 1000 steem. You never intended to pay it out. You and I both know that.
I just wanted to show you, and anyone else reading this, that it could be done. You can make up rules and keep adding retro-active qualifiers as much as you want. It just makes you look like a weasel.
I'm going to keep posting cases. Thousands of them. Maybe some day I will go through them and find the thousand cases that are the worst of the worst. Not that I am expecting you to actually pay up, but by posting these cases, I can simultaneously spread awareness of the issue and show everyone what a lying little weasel you are.
You didn't even follow the rules, why should I give you second chances?
I didn't see any rules stating that the cases couldn't be debated or the list couldn't be updated/amended. You added those rules retroactively. I am sure you will continue to do so. I never believed for a minute that you would actually give me 1000 steem. I would have to be naive enough to not see inherent racism in American policing to believe that line of bs.
I really wouldn't care if you "could provide me with 3000 actual lynchings by police officers" now even if it was with video evidence, because you already fucked up with the first 1000.
Is that how you do your research and learn about the world? If you disagree with someone on one detail, you refuse to believe any future evidence they may present? That's what we call willful ignorance, folks. Wilful ignorance and cognitive dissonance.
No, I call the bet off when the evidence that is given doesn't match the claims.
You refused to review all evidence. You called the bet before all evidence was even presented.
You are practicing willful ignorance and cognitive dissonance in order to not have to acknowledge the ugliness that is racism in American policing, and to weasel out of paying up on a bet. It's pretty pathetic.