Well it looks like someone has been doing their flat-earth research from https://theflatearthsociety.org. LOLz
Why do people always feel the need to go after the weakest straw-man organization or argument when looking to debunk a conspiracy theory. Wouldn't it be much more satisfying to find the strongest arguments and supporters and then attempt to debunk them?
I got to say Stefan I'm a bit disappointed in your lack of homework, then again it's just an april-fools joke. I would actually love to see you talk to some or even one of the actual "flat-earth researchers" not just some kid who watched a few videos like your prior "debate" if you could even call it that.
I'm not a Flat-earther, but I'm also not a believer in theoretical science that relies on faith rather than experimentation as proof(cough cough climate change. If they did it here what's their limit?). This leaves me more in the realm of the skeptic concerning issues outside of our earthly grasp.
A good example of this would be the numbers you quote for the Andromeda galaxy 2.6 million light years away. So what 5.2 million years ago we sent a laser there and it bounced back? If that's the case I guess it doesn't require faith to believe it, but since that clearly didn't happen. By excepting these numbers as gospel we are now operating in the realm of faith, not testable science.
I understand you would not likely be able to play the skeptic concerning such firmly held doctrines of faith, within the "Church of Science". You would lose far to many followers. But maybe some day off the camera, I hope that you do.
Either way, I have always enjoyed your shows. Thank you for making them.