I'm going to presume you're a real person - and mean what you say. (In some other internet dialogues - that is not the case)
I 100% do not fault you for your incredulity.
From where I'm sitting - I'm not at all confident in the guilt or innocence of the people inculpated in Jon Podesta's emails
a reasonable person could conclude that there IS a preponderance of evidence warranting a formal inquiry .
a reasonable person could conclude that there is not. (and I wouldn't lose my composure upon that person)
if you trust that I'm not being adversarial about it (because I'm really not) - I'd be completely open to a public or private debate on the objective facts of this situation
discussing things is underrated
relishing in adversarial enmity is overrated
I appreciate your candor and objectivity - and wish the very best for you while you run this gauntlet of data
in the broader picture - I don't know - forgive me for assuming you're unfamiliar with these things if you are familiar with them:
hang in there man
If, in your opinion, a reasonable person could come to either conclusion, then reason would not seem to hold much value.
Your posts here are proof of that—addressing none of the evidence presented, just... name-calling. Brilliant!
No "evidence" has been presented.
Or—#PizzaGate is another COVER-UP of #sexual #abuse BY PEOPLE LIKE THESE! See: #DutrouxAffair http://isgp-studies.com/belgian-x-dossiers-of-the-dutroux-affair #fakenews
Trump's subtle #PizzaGate joke signals he KNOWS Hillary steals kids from #Haiti. SEE: #FakeNews
You expect people to trust isgp-studies.com, a 4 month old domain? You're shoveling horseshit and calling it candy.