Look at it this way: M-103 by the nature of where this motion is leading; it contradicts C-16 and 89.
What happens when a Muslim can't criticize LGBT (because it is religiously wrong) and LGBT can't criticize a Muslim because of Islamophobia.
I'm not sure Trudeau is paying attention to the ramifications of religion vs lifestyle.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
So I've done a little more reading and had a discussion with someone who is far more knowledgeable of what means what.
A motion (as M-103); is merely a statement of thought. If it doesn't become a Bill it will not become a law.
The 2 bills on the other hand (C-16 and 89) are a step away from becoming law. Hopefully, as written, they are not passed.
If C-16 passes, I can not be discriminated against by referring to everyone as "it".
A person is a human; human is a noun; a noun is an 'it'.
If an 'it' wants to be identified as an "attack helicopter", then an attack helicopter is a noun; a noun is an 'it'; therefore everyone becomes an 'it' for the pronoun game.