Recently, the Ministry of Education has organized a seminar on the secondary education system with the renowned educators of the country. Through this, our government's concern has been expressed about the various changes and examinations that have been done in secondary education. Our initiative is limited only to budget allocation, with the importance of education from Japan, Korea or Vietnam, with the importance of taking up the head from the wreckage of war, at the incredible pace. Again, the fraction of GDP spent in the last five-six years of education is decreasing. That is, at a time when investment in education will increase in the light of the primary education expansion in 2010. Though some of our education policy was made by the famous educators in our region, none of them was implemented. The latest education policy has also been made six years ago and only its implementation has been started.
Following my shared opinion with the concern expressed in the seminar mentioned above:
- Education should be given 6 percent of GDP. Many countries like Cuba or Denmark spend more than that. Unfortunately, in the last few years, our education expenditure has fallen below 2-4 percent of the GDP in the education-related education ministry. Failure to understand the importance of education in the progress of the country is also less responsible for the inadequacy of our resources, as it is responsible for.
- The physical infrastructure, laboratories and teachers' standards of schools and colleges in our country are not as high as compared to the developed world. So, students want to fill this gap with excellent textbooks. The textbook of which one million copies will be printed, it can not be written with any author. It will be written by highly educated dedicated educators with the knowledge and experience of their lifetime. We can not even change the book. There will be no such revolutionary progress in knowledge-science-technology, which will be required to inform the students studying in our school-college. They will learn basic knowledge and science very well.
- Our resources are limited, but the value of these limited resources will be highest if they are expended for human resources development. For this, we have to invest our resources on priority and increase productivity using technology. According to the scheduling of the Television on television channel, if teaching of different subjects of different classes is done through skilled, experienced and well-known teachers, then the opportunity to gain difficult concepts will be created just as the morale of qualified teachers and deprived students of remote areas will increase.
- The question that will be evaluated for 15-20 lakh students, should be a long research crop. We can not remember the weak aspects of students like creative questions, not just traditional, but also encourage them to grasp the basic concepts of any subject. Many questions in the advanced world have seen, the list of theories to use to solve the problem is given on the other side of the question, so they do not have to be memorized. But for that, they have to be creative.
- There are many good school-college needs that can be filled in Tongi to Viqarunnisa or Notre Dame College, but parents have no joy at all. But we do not want to find out how much wasted for this. Not only in developed countries, but also in the neighboring country of India, admission of admission to education is admissible. The country's big interest should be based on admission in school-college admissions. The government has already started the introduction of lottery system in admission to the primary category and has avoided the excessive pressure of sympathetic children. But now it needs metro-based integrated admission system.
- Coaching center does not have the role of admission test, formulation or evaluation of public examination question papers or not. Besides, warfare with Coaching Center is desirable in terms of the inadequacy of our resources. Rather, we should prepare question papers or evaluate the answers sheet so that the training of the coaching center is not successful in the examination of birds.
- We are encouraged to learn the skills and knowledge of the unskilled youth of the children with a lot of incentives because our investments in education are low. Currently, the current GPA system is not able to challenge our students' capabilities. There is no difference between 85 and 86, so we introduced the GPA system to reduce the mistakes. But now a little difference of 79 and 80 appeared so big, his
How to get rid of? The more steps are innumerally wrong, even though the level of error is low. The lesser the steps are wrong, but the level of error is much more. It is clear from the fact that the evaluation of lakhs of students is equal to the talent of millions of students, it is not at all evaluated, the admission of 55 percent GPA-5 students in Dhaka University admission test is clear. - We can not really say, in the last 30 years, a student of Dhaka Board got the highest number in physics or on other matters or in the whole country. Even the student must not have given this information to us. He did not allow him to be proud. It's a good thing to say, good will be good in hundreds of years. Excellence can not be achieved without competition. Competition in limited resources is the most cost-effective way to achieve excellence. A lot of mathematical problems were not solved for a long time. The Clay Mathematical Institute announced a million dollar reward for every solution to the Millennium problem, a problem was resolved immediately.
@originalworks
The @OriginalWorks bot has determined this post by @kyurisha to be original material and upvoted it!
To call @OriginalWorks, simply reply to any post with @originalworks or !originalworks in your message!
I think the best investment a poor country can make in education is more effective teaching methods.
Investing in better technology can be an expensive trap, especially if corruption is and issue. It also requires teachers to be taught to use the technology properly.
By changing schools to a place where students are active in their own learning you can achieve wonders. Look at Finland as an example.
This learning pyramid (from Advanced web banking.com) shows the difference in retention rates from 75% for hands on practice and 90% for teaching. That's why in my country Australia, students do a lot of projects and give presentations and tutorials.