Concerning the earthquakes, if I am not wrong, there is no scientific proof but only an observed correlation. Is it correct?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Concerning the earthquakes, if I am not wrong, there is no scientific proof but only an observed correlation. Is it correct?
correct, but that correlation seem strong enough for me... and I think a few more New Zealanders will be suffering from confirmational bias after this one.
Sure. To be clear, I do not deny the existence of the correlation (and my hopes are with New Zealanders). I was just asking whether some scientific articles had appeared (and that I may have missed) that would confirming 'upgrading the correlation into a scientific fact'. At the end, it is only a matter of how ones defines his/her standards.