Hi Titus - I subbed to Lulz Machine, thanks for trekking to Bilderberg and the Boston Pedogate rally! I really hope you find a solution for the hacker to get the contents of the CPP website to authorities - one thought I had, if any of the CP was transferred or accessed by an IP address out the US then maybe those police authorities would be interested.
I'm writing in regards to Hampstead, as this topic has been covered by a number of YT channels as of late I've immersed myself into this case watching all testimony and reading the medical reports and the judges report. I'm a Harvard trained child psychiatrist, so I feel I need to understand this because other SRA cases have been dismissed as "false memories", at least in my circle of psychiatry, so I'm trying to look at this case without pre-judgment.
After I saw your stated 180 on this case, I was interested to see what you found so compelling. I listened to the two videos (3hours) and Kitty was on Random Rants of Ryan and on your show. I was underwhelmed by their "evidence" and found they were emitting strong emotional opinions and judgments about the mother and her boyfriend, Abe. I went to the Trello board but I didn't see any "evidence" for their opinions. I get why they are put off by Abe on the Jean-Clement (Abe's brother-in-law) secret recording of the sexual abuse disclosure and videos while on vacation in Morocco. I too wondered, and still harbour doubts, but after I listened to 4 recent interviews of Ella, including one with Abe, looking for the detached demeanor and inconsistencies that the Echo Truth videos report, I didn't see this - btw not once did Ella or Abe solicit/ask for funds when given the chance to do so. So when you put that recoding in the context of their decision to return to the UK and immediately seek advice to bring this to the authorities, it is not so far fetched. The kids were in fact telling them that social workers and other authority figures were involved. In fact, Ella refers and recommends that people listen to the Jean-Clement recording. Kitty said on YT that Ella edited out segments with the alleged "coaching" - maybe so, I don't know, something to look into but the fact remains Ella tells people to look at this recording (3 hours).
Taken together with children's testimonies/recanting and the medical evidence (as well as the very dismissive language the judge used in her report, including belittleling and dismissing the opinion of a well-respected 25 yr expert in paediatric abuse cases) and the authorities holding a strategy meeting after the kids testimonies with the principal of the school, someone named by the children (including details of private tattoos)- the probably of evidence is in the other direction. Why was this ever tried in a family court and not criminal court? Why no investigation of named perpetrators or locations described in detailed?
I don't doubt the sincerity of Echo, Kitty and Lulu, yet it is evident from their emotional tone, that they are now no longer objective. I give credit to Lulu to reaching out to some doctors about the extent of physical damage that can be caused by sodomy as described in the case. She received responses that the damage would be terrible and extensive, so she concludes not as described in the medical report. As a child psychiatrist, I only saw one case of child sexual abuse, so I am no expert but that also means few doctors are - I doubt the opinions of a GI specialist or pediatricians without sexual abuse expertise. I would have probably said the same thing as the GI or meds doctors. The expert's findings and opinion in this case is detailed in the two medical reports and is conclusive that the children were sexually abuse consistent with their accounts. I did some medical research using pubmed, I found a solid study published in 2014, that supports the London expert's view. Unfortunately, Lulu and/or another lady, were either briefly referring to wikipedia (misinfo page on RAD, reflexive anal dilation, that dismisses RAD findings are strong indicative of abuse) or the paper the judge quoted in her report (despite the article I link to below being available at the judge). Here's a link to the paper:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4047438/
I wasn't impressed with Echo/Kitty/Lulu collective grasp on the details of the case (Lulu a bit more), given they describe having devoted a lot of time to this topic. If I did the math of my research, it would be about 24 continuous hours (and I don't think I'm an expert in this case but yet I feel I know more facts), perhaps they have spent much more time but it didn't come across in the video, could be a delivery style. Perhaps, they spent more time on the various Hampstead websites (I didn't, I don't judge this to be credible "evidence" but perhaps I'm overlooking some contextual information from the websites). Echo, I think, read this repulsive "poem" she received and she is rightly indignant. She says Abe sent it, but then she doesn't explain how she knows that and doesn't allow for "imposters" given the well known trolling going on this case. It is too bad they didn't (maybe not too late?) interview at least Ella, that they accuse of being at best negligent and at worst a abusing (at least by proxy of Abe) the children. It would have been interesting. Ella has done several interviews, maybe despite Echo Truth's trio's expressed beliefs, she would still consent to an interview?
If you want to go with these ladies' assessment, it's your call, only you know if you've looked at all the evidence with an independent mind.
Stay strong!
-PS: Apologies for long comment :-)