Thank you so much for the further clarification, you do make some very solid and rational points here and I will not argue with your ability to estimate a fire's natural behavior, because as opposed to yourself I have never actively been involved with firefighting.
I guess these types of insight are what I would have normally expected from the MSM covering these events, but where solid reasoning could exist like you have provided here, we get but a thin shadow of an explanation offered by those who have repeatedly lied and have long become exposed for their ties to the powers that be. I say "would have expected of MSM" because I have long stopped expecting MSM to do any other work than spreading a certain narrative for an agenda that is rarely ever disclosed.
All the more reason to celebrate some actual journalists doing the work MSM should be doing. I can also thoroughly appreciate your stance on the energy weapon debate. I find the conclusion premature as well to say the least. It doesn't take some of the oddities away that my layman understanding has huge issues with, but I learned to trust my own senses rather than anyone else's explanation that doesn't jive with my inner being and experience. That said, until we get footage of these energy weapons in action demolishing property there could just as well be other explanation for it, and it's always a good idea to stick with the observable evidence rather than jumping to premature conclusions.
It's the same in any other field of inquiry, but you already know all that. Thanks again for your reply, i followed!