Sure here, meanwhile in the real world I have had a neighbour point to stories like this to oppose our town getting a phone tower. Maybe I took it more personally due to my circumstances but when you really do have someone who believes mobile phones give you cancer trying to force that belief onto you and your an entire community you can get a bit touchy and it makes you want to offer an alternate view point 🙂
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I see. I have seen a lot of "good" data on both sides. What made up my mind is the simple fact that the FCC isn't in the business of providing contradictory data to those who wish to make large sums of money. What the CDC is for, in this case, is to provide plausible deniability to those who will reap tons of cash from adoptive use of this technology and keep the money flowing. 15-20 years down the road the CDC's research will provide cover to those who we might or might not find responsible for what I see is a pretty obvious increase of unexplained diseases/ailments among every age group in world population. You don't have to believe me or anyone, but we can see many gov't agencies becoming more a watchdog for large multi-nationals and lobbyist, much like the rest of gov't. Ever heard of the CDC and the FDA? Pretty dodgy fellas these days if you ask me! I especially love the class-action lawsuit commercials blasted on countless TV networks asking if this or that drug hurt you. They are becoming so commonplace now, and these agencies only allow for class-action suits instead of civil suits. Why? Because that's their real job. Not so much protecting the public. But to feign protection while building a case against why their clients, which is what they really are, should be held to more account. No one is forcing you to click on anything bro. Get over yerself