I'm sure there are plenty of restaurants that do the absolute minimum just because they have to. They would be absolute shit pits if not for regulations. That seems like it would be a good thing, but if there were no regulations, that business would probably go out of business and a new one willing to supply the demand of a clean establishment would take its place. Instead, the bare minimum restaurant keeps running, providing mediocre food in a place that doesn't care about cleanliness and probably only appears to be following the rules. And the people will never experience the clean restaurant that could have been there.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It's like the effect of regulations on employment. We'll never be able to measure what didn't happen, though logically we know
Also, username does NOT check out.
What?
Sorry, it's a reddit phrase. It means the username doesn't jive with the comment. You seem like you understand basic austrian economic theory very well. But your username, the author, has demonstrated quite the opposite in his progressive tweets of late.
I never really got into reddit . I thought that might be what you meant but it was just weird because I had just signed someone up to steemit and am waiting for the verification, and I never really heard that saying before. Just threw me for a loop because of weird timing. Stephen King is actually my name (not the author, except steemit posts). It's a blessing and a curse I suppose.
I understand the curse side of it. I'm active duty and writing under an assumed titled of 'Liberty Lover', but if you knew my name, you'd know I get the famous-person-confusion A LOT!