While I don't doubt your interactions have been contentious at best, I am disinclined to simply take your word for it, since you are preventing @joe.public from responding.
Do you want to claim your comment here is all we need to know regarding @joe.public and that 'trust you, he needs to be silenced' should be our response?
Have you flagged him? Have you harassed him, and libeled him personally?
Is there more that should be said, or is that the extent of your comment on this post?
That makes sense, but isn't it something that could be handled by downvotes, muting him on your end, and/or posting about it to your many followers?
I'm not super savvy, but it seems that blacklisting might be overkill or even further inflame the situation. Blacklisting does seem to be able to provoke rancorous reactions, as is showcased here.
Help me understand why the more mundane routes were insufficient.
Hopefully this bump might catch your attention @themarkymark.
I know @valued-customer, myself, and surely many others would appreciate a serious follow-up.
You might even earn some witness votes.
While I don't doubt your interactions have been contentious at best, I am disinclined to simply take your word for it, since you are preventing @joe.public from responding.
Do you want to claim your comment here is all we need to know regarding @joe.public and that 'trust you, he needs to be silenced' should be our response?
Have you flagged him? Have you harassed him, and libeled him personally?
Is there more that should be said, or is that the extent of your comment on this post?
that is a shit reason to censor you. I'm agin' it.
That makes sense, but isn't it something that could be handled by downvotes, muting him on your end, and/or posting about it to your many followers?
I'm not super savvy, but it seems that blacklisting might be overkill or even further inflame the situation. Blacklisting does seem to be able to provoke rancorous reactions, as is showcased here.
Help me understand why the more mundane routes were insufficient.