I am so utterly appalled at how this arrogant, ignoramus Alec Baldwin can defend his lewd sex scene with a 16yr old girl in the 2006 independent film Mini's First Time; which is further elaborated on in his Twitter feud with Dana Brunetti.
In his report, Brunetti claimed that not only he new actress Nikki Reed was 16, but was perfectly fine with filming said sex scene with her!!
It's one thing to be an actor and doing your job, but it's another thing ENTIRELY to be perfectly comfortable with filming a sex scene with and underage girl while aware she's sweet sixteen!!
You, Mr. Baldwin, have A LOT OF EXPLAINING TO DO!!!
Sure, the mainstream media and his ever-loving lobbyists and publicists will do their best to keep this under raps for the time being, but unfortunately for you, the cat's already out of the bag!!
No use putting Mr. Baldwin on To Catch A Predator; HE'S ALREADY BEEN CAUGHT; though fortunately enough, without his pants on for all the world to see......oh shucks, let's not go there.
To further elaborate on this, please take a moment to watch this video shared from YouTube from YouTuber Pocketsofthefuture where Mr. Baldwin desperately in vain to explain his pitiful excuse as to why he felt adamantly comfortable doing a sex scene with an actress; who's underage no less.
Although this is serious subject matter, I got a few chuckles, NOT for the fact that he did this scene for his own pleasure, but rather for his pitiful, arrogant way of explaining his side of the situation.
You see, Mr. Baldwin. Just because you knowingly committed past crimes, doesn't mean that sooner or later, it's gonna come back to bite you right on your ass.
Now, you're realizing it.
Just like with Bill Cosby, Alec Baldwin is being exposed for the dirty rat that he is.
Such exciting times we're living in, aren't we?
Put your thoughts in the comments below and don't forget to subscribe if you like my content.
Thanks for reading and watching. Take care!!
Wouldn't everyone who paid to see the movie, and got paid in production of the movie be complicit in a sex crime against a minor?
No, only those who directly participated in the act be complicit in a sex crime against a minor; in this case, it's Mr. Baldwin.