So all legislation involving security is bad? Should we end our border security and leave the middle east? Should we dissolve public safety organizations such as the police and the fire departments? You are a cuck to idealism and it shows. Don't deal in absolutes
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Ad hominems are interesting, because not only are they hyperbolic sucker punches, they are resolutely absolute. Those who abuse ad hominems usually feel superior to others. They pre-condition interactions, on-load ascribed social identity roles, and define class types and ranking using deranged language. Effectively, they are used to assert control over others by placing others in a state of dis-ease, whereby the ad hominem abuser can assure their superiority, if only in their minds, by provoking and responding to the other's reaction, with rehearsed melo-dramatic word play, all in the hopes the other will lose their shit and respond negatively; conferring the sense of superiority.
Ideals made this country, not laws. We broke laws to create this country.
But germane to the impetus of my post. There are two circles that converge and overlap. One is Freedom. One is Security. Where they overlap is the balance between relative freedom and security. Each of us find ourselves within the overlapping areas. It also can be seen as a line. One end total Freedom and the other total control. You can only be one place on the line. As you seek security you lose Freedom. We don't become more free by passing laws and living under their enforcement. We become more free by recognizing and living the universal laws, understanding this, may take time. But, if one lives in resonance with universal law, security states, such as we have now, become obstacles to accessing understanding.
This is where I am. Cucking the fuck outta my ideals. Watching them fucc with everyone who read them. And yes, that is goddamn pleasing!