I'd say they are a frequently used part of he plan - along with "leaks" - prime examples being Edward Snowden and Julian Assange- a con artist lapped up hook line and sinker on Steemit!
You stated that you don't think anyone is going to do anything about these events and in particular because 911 is 17 years old. Why would organisers of a 'fake' event go to the bother of having a fake hack about it 17 years later? - this doesn't make much sense if you are inferring that by being 17 years old it is out of the mental reach of people to act against it.
I'd say they are a frequently used part of he plan - along with "leaks" - prime examples being Edward Snowden and Julian Assange- a con artist lapped up hook line and sinker on Steemit!
https://steemit.com/wikileaks/@steemtruth/deconstructing-julian-assange-and-wikileaks-his-childhood-in-a-cult
You stated that you don't think anyone is going to do anything about these events and in particular because 911 is 17 years old. Why would organisers of a 'fake' event go to the bother of having a fake hack about it 17 years later? - this doesn't make much sense if you are inferring that by being 17 years old it is out of the mental reach of people to act against it.
While people are focusing on old stuff they are not looking into current cons like the French yellow jacket supposed revolution.
Distract and divide being key tactics.
Anything exposed about 911 now just doesn't matter. Hell it didn't matter 15 years ago!
PS
https://steemit.com/dlike/@frot/re-rok-sivante-federal-grand-jury-will-finally-hear-evidence-of-a-controlled-demolition-on-911-collective-evolution-20190103t205741867z