"...What you describe is nothing more than fragmented tribalism..."
You either fail to grasp what I report, or misconstrue it. The relationships treated aren't familial, tribal, or political. The results are simply natural consequences of nascent technological development empowering individuals to protect themselves from oppression, and demonstrate the fallacy of your subsequent commentary.
"Can a
maninstitution claim "rights" to earth that he did not create, resources that he did not embed, creatures that he did not quicken?"
I hope that minor correction dispels your misapprehension.
Thanks!